|
|
|
|
Do you need a c-section? This is an article written by Fredric D. Frigoletto Jr., M.D. - April 2005. Here it is. Childbirth may be a perfectly natural process, but it's not a harmless one. Around the world, some 500,000 women die from pregnancy complications each year. Though maternal death is mercifully rare in developed countries, va___al delivery has its complications, such as hemorrhoids, months of back pain and higher risk of incontinence down the road. Natural birth holds risks for babies, too—especially those born to older women. These are just some of the reasons for the steep increase in cesarean sections. Fifty years ago, fewer than one American baby in 50 was delivered surgically. The proportion now exceeds one in four. Critics say the trend toward high-tech delivery wastes money and makes childbirth less safe. Yet some women now demand C-sections, and doctors are ever quicker to perform them. Is all this surgery warranted? What's a prospective mother to do? It's not a simple question. Surgical delivery does spare a woman from labor and its after-effects, and it gives her some flexibility in scheduling delivery at her convenience instead of the baby's. But it also slows recovery. Women who have C-sections can't drive or lift anything heavier than a baby for a few weeks afterward. They require more rest than those who deliver va___ally, and most receive pain medications that can compound their tiredness. The safety issues are even murkier. Surgery can improve birth outcomes in complicated pregnancies, but no one has fully evaluated the impact of elective C-sections. Does surgery raise or lower the risk of complications in women who could safely deliver va___ally? Because elective C-section is such a recent phenomenon, we still don't know. The vast majority of cesareans are still ordered by physicians, and the increase stems mainly from changing medical needs. As women give birth at later ages—and as fertility treatments yield more twins and triplets—babies are more likely to arrive early, when they're too small to risk va___al delivery. Some studies suggest that women receiving epidural anesthesia or labor-inducing drugs are more likely to require a C-section. And improved fetal monitoring has made it easier to tell when a fetus is not reacting well to labor. Even in women with similar risk factors, the rate of C-section varies widely depending on the doctor and the setting. A woman attending a small community hospital is usually seen by one physician who knows her well. This personal care has an obvious upside, but women in these settings often end up having their labor induced, just to guarantee that the familiar physician performs the delivery. Wherever you live, the first step to a good birth is to speak up about your preferences. Many physicians are willing to perform an elective C-section once the mother understands the risks and benefits. But if you've had one cesarean, don't assume you're destined for another. For women without other risk factors (obesity, advanced age, an extended pregnancy, a very large baby, more than one previous C-section), va___al birth after cesarean is only slightly riskier than a second surgery—as long as it's done in a hospital where emergency services are always available. In the end, a lot of what happens during labor will be up to your baby. If the child foils your plans, take heart. It won't be the last time.
|
|
| djh - October 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Well said, Ca__sie. May I add that the advent of fetal monitoring has been a mixed blessing. Many OB's and surgeons I have spoken with say they more times than not pick up false readings (called artifacts) or sometimes indicate normal deviations in fetal heart tones during contractions. One doc even said if we had monitored all the vag births ever most babies would have been "rush-delivered" by c-section to "save" their lives. So while fetal monitoring is good, continuous monitoring can be unfortunate for a normally progressing birth. Also i speak from experience, the long-term damage and effects equated to v____al births also apply to c/s deliveries. When I read the list of complaints women who delivered v____ally compile they could be talking of me, so neither way is with out long-term consequences. Good luck to all you pregnant or future pregnant moms.
|
| Jen - October 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
I think that either way, the body takes a pretty bad "beating" if you will no matter which way you go about it. Personally, I have to have c sections-my mother had to, and her mother had several children die in the womb from not being able to dilate. I labored hard with 1 minute contractions for 3 days-yes, three days. I didn't get past four cm. If I want to have kids, this is the only way I can, and I am so grateful for it. I couldn't imagine losing my 15 month old, 100 years ago and we would have both died that day.
|